Is Oklahoma A New Human Rights Hot Spot?: Why The State's Judges and Governor Were Right To Stop An Execution that Nearly Violated International Law
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
- Organization: Findlaw
- Link: http://writ.news.findlaw.com
Last week, Oklahoma judges considered a fundamental question - the status of international law in state courts in the U.S. And they made a paradigm-shifting decision. Not only did they properly treat a U.S. treaty as binding law, they also relied on a March decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. (The ICJ, the U.N.'s highest tribunal, is also often referred to as the World Court.) The result was to halt an execution that would have taken place May 18--the execution of Mexican national Osbaldo Torres, whose right to assistance from the Mexican consulate was not honored by the U.S.
Human Rights In the United States (Human Rights Watch)
ACLU Updates
- A Very Big Thank You!
- Ohio Governor Commutes Kevin Keith's Death Sentence!
- Act Now! Tell Gov. Strickland to Grant Kevin Keith Clemency
- Race Contributes to Wrongful Convictions
- ACLU Asks Supreme Court To Review Case Concerning South Dakota Elections System That Dilutes The American Indian Vote
- Is New York the Next "Papers Please" State?
Amnesty International USA Latest News
- Amnesty International Urges Sri Lanka to Ensure Safety of the Detained Former Asylum Seekers
- Amnesty International Calls on the United Nations to Establish an International Commission of Inquiry into Human Rights Violations in Myanmar
- Sri Lanka urged to ensure safety of detained former asylum-seekers
- Sri Lanka urged to ensure safety of detained former asylum seekers
- Iranian journalist and human rights defender set to face trial
- Slovak government urged to end segregation for Romani children
