Is Oklahoma A New Human Rights Hot Spot?: Why The State's Judges and Governor Were Right To Stop An Execution that Nearly Violated International Law
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
- Organization: Findlaw
- Link: http://writ.news.findlaw.com
Last week, Oklahoma judges considered a fundamental question - the status of international law in state courts in the U.S. And they made a paradigm-shifting decision. Not only did they properly treat a U.S. treaty as binding law, they also relied on a March decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. (The ICJ, the U.N.'s highest tribunal, is also often referred to as the World Court.) The result was to halt an execution that would have taken place May 18--the execution of Mexican national Osbaldo Torres, whose right to assistance from the Mexican consulate was not honored by the U.S.
Human Rights In the United States (Human Rights Watch)
ACLU Updates
- This Week in Civil Liberties (2/3/2012)
- Threat to Current Sentencing Law Looms: Are We Headed Back to Mandatory Guidelines?
- Cybersecurity Bill Advances in House � But Does it Advance Privacy?
- Gerson Gets it Wrong on Contraception
- Civil Liberties in the Digital Age: Weekly Highlights (2/3/2012)
- Breaking the Addiction to Incarceration: Weekly Highlights
Amnesty International USA Latest News
- Paraguay: Land dispute victory for displaced indigenous community
- Cambodia: Khmer Rouge judgment welcome, but raises human rights concerns
- UN court ruling on Nazi war crime victims �a setback for rights�
- Pakistan should protect Ahmaddiya community against threats of violence
- Yemen: One year on since the start of mass protests
- Cambodia: Stop the use of excessive force against peaceful land activists
