The Alien Tort Claims Act: How Powerful a Human Rights Weapon Is It?
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
- Organization: Findlaw
The decision was eagerly awaited by both human rights groups and multinational corporations. The Bush Justice Department had urged the Court to restrict, if not completely gut, the scope of the ATCA - a reading that would have greatly benefited multinationals. In contrast, human rights groups had urged the Court to read the statute broadly, to vindicate the rights to noncitizens to sue for human rights violations in U.S. federal courts.
The Court's decision seemed to rebuke the government. Accordingly, the media generally portrayed the decision as a victory for the human rights community. But in fact, as I will argue in this column, the Court's opinion in Sosa cannot be easily categorized as a victory for anyone.
Human Rights In the United States (Human Rights Watch)
- Immigration Enforcement Doesn't Belong in the Courthouse
- What Captain America Has to Say About the NSA
- The Government is Silencing Twitter and Yahoo, and It Won't Tell Us Why
- Way to go DHS! And Shame on the Rest of You
- Living Under Surveillance at the Border � for What?
- Guant�namo Dispatch: A Hard-Earned Trust in Peril
Amnesty International USA Latest News
- Saudi Arabia jails lawyer and human rights activist in ongoing crackdown on dissent
- Israel: Lift �ludicrous� restrictions on whistleblower Vanunu decade after release
- Libya: Trial of former al-Gaddafi officials by video link a farce
- Viet Nam: Prisoners of conscience released but dozens remain jailed
- Algeria: Pre-election clampdown exposes �gaping holes� in human rights record
- Kenya: Somalis trapped in �catch-22� amid crackdown on refugees