The Alien Tort Claims Act: How Powerful a Human Rights Weapon Is It?
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
- Organization: Findlaw
The decision was eagerly awaited by both human rights groups and multinational corporations. The Bush Justice Department had urged the Court to restrict, if not completely gut, the scope of the ATCA - a reading that would have greatly benefited multinationals. In contrast, human rights groups had urged the Court to read the statute broadly, to vindicate the rights to noncitizens to sue for human rights violations in U.S. federal courts.
The Court's decision seemed to rebuke the government. Accordingly, the media generally portrayed the decision as a victory for the human rights community. But in fact, as I will argue in this column, the Court's opinion in Sosa cannot be easily categorized as a victory for anyone.
Human Rights In the United States (Human Rights Watch)
- Democracy Can't Wait
- Groups Charge North Carolina is Trying to Prevent Voters from Participating in 2014 Elections
- Should LGBT Activists in India Just Give Up?
- "One Man, One Vote": Nelson Mandela on Voting Rights
- Congress Can Create a Smarter Criminal Justice System
- "Mail Covers" Case Another Reminder That Oversight Is a Constant Battle
Amnesty International USA Latest News
- United Nations Must Tackle the Looming Human Catastrophe in the Central African Republic
- Northern Ireland: A blanket amnesty would be an utter betrayal of victims
- Bulgaria: �Inhuman conditions� spark protest at refugee camp
- Russia: A year on, Putin�s �foreign agents law� choking freedom
- Cambodia: Global call to release Yorm Bopha ahead of Supreme Court appeal
- With or without EU agreement, Ukraine must eradicate torture