The Alien Tort Claims Act: How Powerful a Human Rights Weapon Is It?
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
- Organization: Findlaw
The decision was eagerly awaited by both human rights groups and multinational corporations. The Bush Justice Department had urged the Court to restrict, if not completely gut, the scope of the ATCA - a reading that would have greatly benefited multinationals. In contrast, human rights groups had urged the Court to read the statute broadly, to vindicate the rights to noncitizens to sue for human rights violations in U.S. federal courts.
The Court's decision seemed to rebuke the government. Accordingly, the media generally portrayed the decision as a victory for the human rights community. But in fact, as I will argue in this column, the Court's opinion in Sosa cannot be easily categorized as a victory for anyone.
Human Rights In the United States (Human Rights Watch)
Amnesty International USA Latest News
- Venezuela: El creciente clima de violencia y polarizaci�n sofoca los derechos humanos
- Ukraine: Human rights monitors urgently needed as journalists and activists face wave of attacks in Crimea
- DRC/ICC: Katanga found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity
- Malaysia: Anwar Ibrahim decision a �bleak day for justice�
- Free Saudi Arabian human rights activists on hunger strike
- DRC: All you need to know about the historic case against Germain Katanga